Disabled passengers will still face a half hour trek to catch their
train even if a new 200 space car park is built.
If they can't make the half mile trip to get to the Leeds-Bradford
platform at Steeton and Silsden railway station
, they
are forced to catch a train going in the opposite direction, so they
can swap platforms more easily further up the line.
At the moment disabled passengers can't take the most direct route
- taking only a few minutes - because of a flight of 40 steps up and
40 steps down from the car park to the Leeds-Bradford platform.
Now, disabled travellers are demanding action to put a car park on
both sides of the station.
But a spokesman for the county transport body Metro said to create
a car park on the Bradford side would be "an expensive job" because
the land is on a flood plain and would need raising.
The plan for a new car park on the Skipton side should stop
commuters, who travel from North Yorkshire and Lancashire, from
parking on streets and angering residents in the two villages.
Cllr David Mullen, who is disabled, from Steeton with Eastburn
Parish Council, said that if the car park was built, the extra spaces
would be of big benefit to the area, but would not help the disabled.
He said: "Steeton is just like one big car park at the moment.
People are coming in from as far away as Burnley. They all come into
Steeton because that is where the Metro fares start, and there is
quite a difference in cost between there and further up."
But he said that, even with the new parking, the railway would
still effectively function as two separate stations for disabled
people.
Because there are no parking facilities on the Leeds/Bradford bound
side of the station, disabled passengers currently face two
unappealing choices.
They can park on the Skipton-bound side and get to the correct
platform via the station access road. They have to go over the railway
bridge, across Station Road, up to the roundabout and down the
disabled access route - a distance of about half a mile. Or, they can
get on a Skipton-bound train and switch platforms in Skipton to catch
the correct train to Leeds or Bradford.
Because the Steeton station has no facilities such as disabled
lifts or ramps across the track, wheelchair users returning from
Skipton are faced with the same problems.
Cllr Mullen, said: "As you are now, you have the station car park
on one side, and if you are wanting to go to Leeds you have to go over
the road and down to the other platform."
Diane Dale, project co-ordinator for support volunteering at
Keighley Volunteer Service, said it was important for disabled people
to have good access to public transport so that they can partake in
the same everyday activities as able-bodied people.
She said: "Some of the people we work with are physically disabled
and it is important for us because the volunteers we work with have to
get to their placements and for that they need public transport.
"It is imperative that people can get to the same places you and I
can."
But a spokesman for county transport body Metro said the land
nearby is on a flood plain, so to create a car park for disabled users
at the other side of the station, the land would need to be raised,
which is an expensive job.
Metro added: "We will be attending a meeting with the rail
industry, local council and representatives of the company which owns
the nearby land and wants to construct a car park."
The car park is planned for an area currently owned by Airedale
Tree Surgeons.
At a Joint Transport Working Party - which includes the town
councils of both Silsden and Steeton - disabled access was highlighted
as an issue that still needs to be addressed.
Craven ward councillor Adrian Naylor, who chaired the meeting,
said: "The concept is a good one but many issues still need to be
resolved, such as how vehicles will enter and exit the site.
"There are currently two suggestions, either a one-way system, or
widening the current entrance to allow two lanes of traffic to exit
the site and one to enter.
"Other issues discussed concerned pedestrian safety and the
possible need for a crossing, access for disabled users and the need
for improved lights."
From the archive
www.keighleynews.co.uk
© Newsquest Media Group 2008